This review originally appeared on Opera Britannia’s website.
The Royal Conservatoire of Scotland have produced some excellent operas in recent years, which makes the disappointment of this production of Così fan tutte all the more acute. Singing that was generally competent never managed to overcome the obstacle of an orchestra seemingly intent on sabotaging a show that was in any case internally incoherent.
Director Nicolette Molnár’s opening gambit was quite interesting. The lights went up on stage during the overture on a collection of female mannequins dressed in period costume, each apparently standing upon a collection of blocks and short staircases which were the full extent of the set. In fact, they were all attached to wires and after just standing there for the duration of the overture and the first few minutes of the singing, they disappeared heavenwards. Though they were to reappear occasionally during the evening and descend again right at the end of the production, they seemed very much like an opportunity missed. One has to go to quite a lot of effort to dress up dummies and make them fly up and down on a stage, so it might be thought that there was an idea in there that was going to feature in some way throughout the rest of the evening. It was the first of several interesting but slightly odd elements which made up a production which didn’t really hang together.
It soon became clear that the first part of the action (and its conclusion, when we were to eventually arrive at the end) was set in a hospital where soldiers were being treated in war time. Again, this was an interesting idea; though whilst it did make some sense of Ferrando and Guglielmo being called up to fight by their regiment, it still didn’t make a great deal of sense overall. We were introduced to Fiordiligi and Dorabella as a pair of nurses tending the wounded. So far so good, but do nurses tend to have ladies’ maids, as these two rather posh nurses inevitably had? It seems unlikely.
Herein lay the basic problem. There’s enough implausibility in Così fan tutte – more than enough really, without introducing other puzzles for the audience to try to work out. Anyway, so much for the stage business, what about the singing?
First up were the men. Richard Shaffrey and Euros Campbell were reasonably matched as Ferrando and Gugliemo – much more so than the sisters whom they were in the business of wooing. Both also got significantly richer in tone as the evening progressed, making me wonder whether they each needed to do a bit more in the warm-up department before hitting the stage. I became more impressed with Shaffrey’s voice the longer I was in the theatre and eventually he was filling the theatre with apparent ease. I’m no native Italian speaker, but there was something about his vowels which made me think of France rather than Italy. Campbell, on the other hand, seemed quite at home. Again, once his voice warmed up a bit he was on much stronger ground than during the first half hour or so. There were one or two moments when I doubted his intonation, but given the sounds coming from the pit, I think he can hardly be blamed for that.
The nurse-sisters whom they were wooing were not quite so well matched. Annabella Ellis’s Fiordiligi had a somewhat forced tone throughout the performance and she appeared to have little dynamic awareness. The voice was either full on or full off. Jessica Eccleston’s Dorabella was much more subtle and she was also clearly a more accomplished actress, displaying some wonderfully coquettish flirtation.
The trouble with an unbalanced pair of singers in these roles is not when they are trying to outdo one another in their romantic affairs, it’s when they sing together. The famous trio “Soave sia il vento” should be the highlight of the first act, but sadly it was totally unbalanced here, with Eccleston being inaudible, Ellis being far too audible and Stefan Berkieta’s Don Alfonso simply lacking the vocal power and drive needed to underpin the whole thing.
His Don Alfonso wasn’t really given enough character either, but that’s primarily an issue of direction. There must be some motivation for Don Alfonso’s actions in pitting the lovers against one another – is it just a jolly jape or is there a darker and altogether more wicked motivation behind things?
A significant bright element of the production was Joanna Norman as Despina the maid. She had a deliciously bright and perky voice, she knew how to act and she made the most of the comedy of her role. She shone out as a significant presence on the stage and I was left hoping that I’ll see and hear a lot more of her in the future.
Così fan tutte is inevitably a battle of the sexes and there was no doubt at all that in the first half of the evening, the women won hands down. Later on in the evening things were playing out a little more evenly. I’m sorry to report that the biggest disappointment of the evening was the standard of the orchestral playing. Timothy Dean was conducting with perfect sensitivity to the singing in terms of volume and pace, which were both excellent. The trouble was, not all of the orchestra were capable of playing the music. The violins struggled all evening to play in tune and the woodwind were having trouble with the fine runs of the overture and produced a strangely muddy sound when playing together later. The less said about the horn accompaniment to Fiordiligi’s aria “Per pietà” the better.
One other point should be mentioned: if the male lovers are to be brought onto the stage disguised as comedy Scotsmen then they need better fitting kilts – especially if they are required to sit, roll and generally loll about on a set which puts their nether regions at the audience’s eye level.
Sadly, this wasn’t the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland’s finest hour, but Iet’s hope their future productions will return to their usual high standards
Kelvin Holdsworth
37 responses to “Keeping the faith”
It was an inspiring recitation. Following the English translation in the service sheet provided added insight to the life of Mary. All the more so as the cathedral is dedicated to St Mary. You are reminded of Mary every time you walk into the building with the Gwyneth Leech mural over the High Altar.
Kelvin is quite right. The very self-righteous defenders of the Bible (including the ones who trolled a brave young Muslim woman, for days, with the most vile language, and those who did not reprimand them) totally ignored the Biblical instructions for raising concerns with a brother in faith (Matthew 18:15; 2 Tim 23). Very practical instruction too! As anyone who has ever lived in community can verify. Could all these obsessive men *please* stop trying to divide our communities in Glasgow. We will not be divided. At the first sign of trouble we rush out to embrace one another. These abusers have much to repent of, even if *just* standing by while others throw stones.
I HATE it when the wrong tune is picked for a hymn … it is simply an abomination before God.
However, helping people to think about how we share hospitality, welcome and learn from each other is the WAY of God! Blessings on you Kelvin.
Some reasons why this time was different:
1. The other quaran recitations you mentioned happened at Nine Lessons and Carols, or special ecuminical and interfaith events. While 9L&C was originally a modified Evensong, nowadays it’s usually considered a seasonal community musical recitial with a religious tinge, so having a Muslim from the community recite something from their faith would seem natural enough. Civic and interfaith services will likewise naturally include representatives of every faith in the community. By contrast the Eucharist is the central act of Christian worship and people expect to hear ONLY Christian doctrine proclaimed in the Holy Eucharist. In other words, this was the wrong venue for showing hospitality to Muslim neighbors. You did not intend to practice syncretism, but I think the outcome was syncretic despite your good intentions.
2. Post Brexit (and post Trump) British Muslims are now seen as alien invaders rather than fellow members of the community.
3. Because hostility to Muslims is now fashionable, the Express and rest of the gutter press decided that this was a story worth reporting. Since conservative Americans often read the online editions of the British gutter press, the story then went global.
4. Because you are gay and out, your every action is scrutinized for any possible hint of heresy by GAFCON and Co.
Of all these reasons, only reason #1 is a legitimate criticism, but I hope you do think about criticism #1 as well as defending yourself from other, illegitimate criticisms.
Thank you for your comment Whit J – all the more because it is a thoughtful criticism.
I’ve plenty to reflect on about the how and the when we do things like that and I do hear loudly and clearly that many people think this was an inappropriate context. Though of course, I’d be bound to say that some are saying that the Eucharist is precisely the place indeed there are some saying that is what it is for.
I’m not going to get into a back and forth with all the comments on this post and I’m deliberately not letting through things that have already been said but be assured that I’ve heard the criticism and will reflect on it not simply now but over coming months. (I’ve learned a lot about where God is this week that will take a long time to process). I’m grateful for the way you’ve made your point.
I think there is a good deal in what Whit J says, although I am not sure the effect actually was syncretic. I think one does perhaps have to be a regular worshipper at St Mary’s to understand how totally orthodox the worship there is, and how much Jesus is the focus of worship – how utterly unlikely it is that anyone there would make the mistake of thinking he was not revered by the congregation as a whole as very God from very God. It would be impossible for them not to realise that all the clergy there rejoice in this belief. The congregation saw the words of the Qu’ran in an English translation which portrayed that book’s far-from-easy-to-follow account of Islam’s view of the conception of Jesus, in which there was nothing offensive, and heard a very beautiful voice singing in a strange and glorious language. These were clearly indicated to be the beliefs of another faith. We certainly neither saw or heard or understood any insult to the person of Christ. I am sure none was intended, either. Whereas, and this bears repeating, I am totally sure that many of those commenting (not of course by any means all of them, and nobody whose comments are published here) simply wish harm to relationships between the great faiths in Glasgow.
I have spent my whole adult life in dialogue with people of other religious traditions, it has been deeply rewarding. However I feel that what happened at this service was profoundly wrong. When we are truly ourselves we allow other people to be profoundly themselves. The truth of Christianity is not compatible with any other religion. To avoid that incompatibility is to avoid reality. Worship of Jesus is the fountain of our faith the Qu’ran is opposed to that. I love Jesus and therefore cannot conceive of reading the Qu’ran in an act of worship – no problem doing so in other contexts but not in worship. I am profoundly disturbed that you cannot see this Kelvin.
There are so many things aren’t there, not just around this issue which we hold dear in faith and which we can’t see from another perspective?
I can hear and see that people are upset by this and clearly there are many people not upset by it too. And obviously, at least I hope obviously, I love Jesus too.
The trouble with religious questions and the questions that religious people have I think is that so often that our love for our faith can make it impossible to comprehend others who also claim to love the same faith but who take different views about things. We can hear them claim that love but be intellectually unable to process it because it leads them to different conclusions.
I’ve found the same thing to be true in the sexuality debates very frequently though I perceive that to be changing sometimes now. Similarly with other identity issues and some political issues. Israel/Palestine conversations for example often seem to be conducted (when they are conducted at all) by people who seem to behave like ships passing in the night.
I happen to have views about Church Schools which are pretty intransigent and negative. You are one of the few people, no the only person, who ever made me really think there might be a point of view about them other than mine which might have an integrity I could respect. And I’m very grateful for that.
Kelvin, thank you for your reply. I have enormous respect for you. I have no doubt that church schools can be argued against from perfectly respectable positions. Worship of Jesus is simply a different order, it cannot include a reading from the Qu’ran. Worship is one thing, study, dialogue, relationship something else.
I am really grateful to Richard for the phrase “When we are truly ourselves we allow other people to be profoundly themselves” which reflects my experience of interfacing with sincere people of other faiths. Is a Christian Eucharist a place this should happen? I can understand some Christians feeling it is not, but as long as everything was clearly labelled as what it was and the integrity of the liturgy was intact, I can also understand some feeling it is.
Brother Kelvin,
Although I do not agree with allowing the Koran to be read in our Christian churches, I truly appreciated your firm and resolute stand for the deity of Jesus. He is our great God and Savior and I love Him very much. Blessings from Tennessee.
Just as a perhaps amusing point of reference, the 1982 hymnal of the Episcopal church in the USA has “Brightest and best of the STARS” (caps mine) “of the morning,” apparently so as to avoid offending any daughters who might be present, and the two tunes included are “Morning Star” by James Proctor Harding (1850-1911) and “Star in the East” from The Southern Harmony (1835). The Harding tune was also in the 1940 Hymnal, wherein the word “sons” was still used.
I am not clear as to whether the hospitality at St Mary’s anticipates infinite extension of parallel lines between Islam and the Church in Glasgow. Are you planning some opportunities for Glasgow Muslims to understand the Christian faith and prepare for Baptism and the glorious liberty of regeneration by the Holy Spirit? (In whichever order; no axe about that!) As you move around the Glasgow community and meet more Christians of Islamic background, why not invite such to participate in groups for new Muslim enquirers? The testimony of an ex-Muslim can express vibrantly “How I know He lives” (as your SA brethren would sing). You might find not only new hearts from a divine work of grace among your Muslim neighbours but in other neighbours too. Amen. Inshallah!
There are a small number of people in St Mary’s who are converts from Islam to Christianity just as there are a small number of people in local mosques who are converts from Christianity to Islam.
St Mary’s regularly puts on events and courses for people discovering and exploring Christianity. Most living religions do the same thing.