From time to time, I contribute to Wikipedia, particularly the SEC (and related) pages. Several things have interested me on WP this week.
Firstly, a little toing and froing about whether the SEC has parishes. It doesn’t have parishes, though some, especially those from outside the province speak rather loosely as though we do. This loose talk even extends to 2 diocesan websites which refer to parishes, making my argument that we don’t have them more difficult to sustain than it should have been. The fact remains that there is no concept of parish in SEC canon law. (And that is that, listen up everyone).
Secondly, the difference between the WP article on the SEC and that in the online Britannica – which hasn’t been updated since about 1970.
Thirdly, a line appearing today by an anonymous author in Bishop David’s WP entry articulating his achievements in acquiring a wife and children along life’s journey. For a while, the SEC Info and Comms Board had a policy of not listing such achievements in bishops’ biographies. [On the grounds that such listings tended towards either a) sexism; b) heterosexism; c) triumphalism or d) a combination of the above].
I don’t know whether that policy still applies and I cannot remember whether the words, "heterosexist hegemony of coupledom" appear in the minutes of the meeting where that policy was discussed.
But I do know who uttered those words.
Is it just possible that one can take oneself too seriously?
Leave a Reply