• Love means love – a sermon for Midnight Mass 2018

    It was the middle of the night. It was dark – the night black as pitch beyond the cold bright lights which shone in our faces. And it was surprisingly cold.

    Crossing the border should have been easy.

    But they made us all get off the train and queue up to have our passports stamped.

    September 2018 and I was trying to leave the EU.

    Not for long mind. Just a week’s holiday in Istanbul and to get there, a bit of an adventure on a night train across the border.

    Which led me to be standing there in the middle of the night whilst a guard checked my passport and then my visa. And then gestured me to one side.

    “In there” he said gruffly.

    And I found myself in a small room with a guard wearing no uniform or identification badge being interrogated, in the middle of the night.

    A small room. My passport taken away. My visa taken away. All my belongings on the train which was due to move off at any moment. And here, I was being interrogated in the middle of the night.

    This is not a particularly unusual thing for some members of this congregation who have come from places of danger to live in relative safety in this country. But a new experience for me.

    A few questions about where I was going, where I was staying. Who I would be meeting. When would I be leaving.

    Then he asked to see my phone.

    “Open up!” he barked. “Let me see pictures”.

    And so he went through the last 2 and  half years of photographs on my phone. Pics I’d taken of friends and all the photographs of me that facebook had saved to my phone.

    “What this?” he roared. “What these”.

    It was pictures of me dressed head to toe in gold. Or green. Or purple. Or red.  Standing here. Celebrating. Preaching.

    “What you do!”

    “Well, I’m a priest”

    “We don’t need no priests in our country. We don’t need no preachers here!”

    And I said, “…..

    Well, let’s leave what I said for another time and fast forward.

    Fast forward a couple of days and I find myself standing in an old church in a seldom visited quarter of Istanbul.

    Around me are pictures. Mosaics. Frescos. Gold and glitz. And the frescos tell familiar stories.

    An elaborate one shows a bunch of tax collectors turning up in Nazareth and telling a young woman that she and her man need to go off and be registered in their home town.

    Another one next to it shows a familiar story – the same young woman clearly expecting a child riding a donkey led towards Bethlehem by Joseph – gentle, patient and maybe worried about what they will find when they get there.

    Picture after picture. Mosaic after mosaic. Fresco after fresco.

    Each one preaching forth the story that we are familiar with and which draws each of us here tonight for some reason or another.

    The story of the One who gave up heaven and took up residence on earth.

    The story of the Lord of eternity coming among us and accepting for a short lifetime all the constraints of time and place, pain and particularity.

    The story of one who comes to share the story of heaven by sharing the stories of earth.

    And as I stood and gazed at the glorious pictures all around me I realised that plenty of preachers had been there before me. Some of them no doubt preaching sermons and some preaching all I ever want to be able to say with nothing but pigment and paintbrush.

    For God comes into this world tonight. And we bear witness to the birth at midnight. In a world which needs the light of the world to shine.

    But back to that challenge at the border on another dark, cold night.

    What about that suggestion that there’s no need for preachers.

    I beg to differ.

    This world needs more preachers. Needs you to be preachers.

    This world needs those who will hear the song of the angels singing peace on earth and preach it to the nations.

    This world needs those who will see the refugee family fleeing from Bethlehem and who will preach to the Herods of our own day who seek to build a hostile environment instead of proclaiming what is forever just – that those who flee for their life as refugees should be always welcome.

    The world needs those who will see the tenderness of our blessed Lady towards our blessed Lord – the child in the manger and who will preach the beauty and the passion and the commitment of that love to every soul who is vulnerable. Preach not just with paintpot and pigment but with politics and passion too.

    We are living through strange times in this land.

    We are living out the inane reality of the absurd declaration that Brexit means Brexit.

    There is far more to be said than that.

    For our Blessed Lady – no mean preacher herself told us, there are the humble and the meek to exalt and those of us who love this child in the manger have a job to do making sure that those as vulnerable as he was are kept in mind through whatever political uproar occupies us.

    There are those who are hungry who need to be filled. And filled by those who take their place at the manger in adoration, who are inspired to set others free with imaginations set alight by what they find in the crib.

    And there are inane tyrants to be mocked. For God will bring down the mighty from their seat and it is our privilege and joy to delight in their fall.

    Brexit may mean Brexit. Whatever that means.

    Leave may mean leave. Even though no-one seems able to define what that looks like in a way that we will all agree on.

    But this night we celebrate something altogether more profound and the antidote to the inanity that we find all around us.

    God comes into the world not to show us that leave means leave but to tell us once and for all that love means love.

    Love means love.

    Laid in a manger.

    Here for you and here for me.

    Love for you and love for me.

    And the world does need preachers from every tribe and tongue to share this good news:

    Love is come into the world. Love enough for everyone.

    In the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit. Amen.

9 responses to “RSA Animations”

  1. annie t Avatar
    annie t

    Fascinating stuff; like watching a (very) animated Paulo Freire! Loved the insight ‘collaboration is the stuff of growth’. Interesting implications for a congregational paradigm for theological education. Thanks Kelvin.

  2. kelvin Avatar

    Yes – I was also reminded of my synod question about TISEC, which I still don’t think I’ve received an adequate answer to, which was something like this: “Is learning through TISEC driven by normalised marking or learning outcomes?”

  3. Kimberly Avatar

    presumably neither, but by the grace of God?

    (‘normal’, ‘outcomes’, and ‘TISEC’ all in the same sentence could lead to much fun. But I suspect I’d head down the via negativa again.)

    1. kelvin Avatar

      The answer that I got was “both” though I’ve never believed that can be possible. I do believe that TISEC at one time or another took on the trappings of each of those learning models, but that is not the same thing at all.

  4. Rosemary Hannah Avatar
    Rosemary Hannah

    Can I gently suggest that the Tisec you love to hate has over the years changes significantly?

  5. kelvin Avatar

    TISEC has always claimed to be changing – in that way it always is the same.

    I do accept that things have changed but have no way of knowing whether they have changed for the better. I still know people whom it appears to suit and I still know people who get distressed by what is done to them within it. In that respect at least, again, it remains the same.

    I’ve said before now that one of the reasons that TISEC is something that still presents unresolved issues for some of us who went through it is that there was never any public accountability within the church over what was done to us. No-one was ever held responsible and even though TISEC itself went through several reviews, the reasons for those reviews being carried out were never transparent.

    I’d still be happy to receive a coherent answer to the question. Incidentally, when I was in TISEC, the answer was clear – it was driven by learning goals and outcomes.

    I was at the General Synod where we voted for TISEC to cease to be a teaching institution. That was a pretty strong decision and one which was enthusiastically celebrated by some. (I went to the celebratory lunch afterwards and some folk came up from England for it). That does make it hard to understand what has happened subsequently.

  6. Rosemary Hannah Avatar
    Rosemary Hannah

    More than it would be appropriate for me as a staff member to answer to, and more than I am the most appropriate person to answer to, educational theory not being my speciality. However, FWIW I can answer to the fact that normalised marking is firmly in place, and that our external examiner is more than happy with the standards our students achieve. Beyond doubt all those who get a diploma from us have achieved the educational equivalent of the first two years of University education.

  7. kelvin Avatar

    Well, this isn’t comparing like with like as the current external examiner acts for an institution (albeit one which may have a financial interest) that had nothing to do with TISEC when I was in it, however, I can say that the external reports on TISEC were always astonishingly good.

    All the more astonishing for those of us who were in TISEC at the time I was, actually.

    It would be interesting to compare the quantifiable academic achievements of Scottish ordinands over time. I’ve a notion that two years of university study falls short of the standards for ordinands which the General Synod was hoping for when it last voted on a report about TISEC.

  8. Rosemary Hannah Avatar
    Rosemary Hannah

    The current external examiner is, it is true, employed; however he is not a member of the qualifying institution. He is a member of another independent academic institution, thereby bringing to his examination direct knowledge of at least three bodies (theirs, ours and his as it were). The work of our students is scrutinised by two markers at Tisec, and each piece of work scrutinised by the external examiner who checks it is achieving the same standards as YSJ. The over-all standard of YSJ is likewise scrutinised to ensure it too is achieving work of the same standard for the same level as other Universities.

    The question of whether standards nationally have risen or fallen is a different question, and harder to ascertain. We may indeed have our own different opinions. But I think it beyond doubt that the general level of the work of Tisec students is the same as the level (qualification for qualification) as the standard of students nation wide. So very much work goes into ensuring this.

    Personally, I would not be prepared to grant a degree in anything involving Biblical studies without knowledge of the Biblical languages. However it is a fact that the Universities now often do this – and indeed even forty years ago it was possible to obtain a M. Theol at St Andrews with only Greek. However regrettable this is, insisting on a full degree will not restore this.

    For those who study for a qualification with Tisec while working, as indeed for those who study with other bodies while working, to achieve two years of degree level study while in a full time job is a considerable achievement. To reach degree standard would take another 18 months I suppose – and that is a decision for the church to take.

    While I would be very sympathetic to the idea of encouraging more students to undertake a full time degree at a University, the funding of such things is a decision for the denomination, not Tisec. To ensure this in the present economic climate would be expensive, and for students who already have personal commitments, not always possible. This is why most English dioceses offer part-time training. The brief for Tisec is to offer a course that those NOT taking a full-time a course can follow, together with specifically vocational study which the Universities do not provide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Posts

  • Listen up! Moocs are the future

    OK listen up. Moocs are the future. Now before we go any further, let’s get the usual responses out of the way. The usual responses are twofold: What’s a mooc?  (Most people) *rolls eyeballs* (lots of academics, including quite a few in my congregation) Firstly, a mooc is a term used for a new form…

  • How to be Single at Christmas – repost

    This post was first published in 2010 I find myself wanting to write something about being single at Christmas. After all, I’ve got some experience to draw on. There was a time when I used to find being on my own at Christmas a tricky thing to think about, but these days its one of…

  • Gender Segregation in Universities and Elsewhere

    Having been involved in university chaplaincy a couple of times, the issue of gender segregation in universities that has come up in the news is not a new thing for me to think about. There have been a couple of news reports about issues surrounding Islamic groups in universities this week and quite a lot…

  • Rudolphus

    I’m not sure who is responsible for translating Rudolph the Red Nose Reindeer into latin and setting it to plainsong. Whoever it was, they have earned an Advent Blessing and a Tip of the Biretta from me. You can hear it here: