• A Scottish Kalendar

    Once upon a time, many years ago, by which we mean up until the 1990s, the Scottish Episcopal Church used to publish an annual Kalendar which listed, for every day of the year, a set of bible readings for devotional reading, what saint’s day might happen to fall on that day and the liturgical colour for the day.

    It was immensely useful but was immensely difficult for someone to compile.

    At some point a decision was made to stop publishing it and instead to publish a comprehensive lectionary which listed all the possible combinations of bible readings that you could ever encounter along with a guide to the lectionary that was produced each year. The lectionary and guide are available on the Scottish Episcopal Church webpage here: http://www.scotland.anglican.org/who-we-are/publications/liturgies/calendar-and-lectionary/

    The trouble is, people find the lectionary very difficult to use. You can’t just open it up and see what bible readings you might read on any one day as you need to know which year you are in (1 or 2 for daily readings, A, B or C for the Sunday readings in church). You need to know whether you want readings for Daily Prayer or for a Eucharist. And you need to check in the guide which form of Daily Prayer you should be using that week if you are doing that and you need to check whether it is a feast day which might alter what you are doing and the way in which it might change what you are supposed to be doing.

    In short, checking the readings became something  that you needed to learn how to do rather than something you could just read from the Kalendar for every day of the year. And I think this has had quite an impact. It was much easier to give people copies of the Kalendar by way of supplying daily bible readings than it is to tell people to download the lectionary and guide and teach them how to use it.

    At the time that this change happened, I lamented somewhat.

    However, I also thought about it. For it seemed to me that this was a task that a half-decent computer programmer could get a computer to do.

    Reader, I am that computer programmer, albeit only one who is half-decent.

    Anyway, I started to write some routines to calculate the Kalendar about 19 years ago thinking it wouldn’t take me long to complete.

    Every year before Advent Sunday I’ve tinkered with it and had a go at producing a Kalendar. Each year I’ve failed dismally and got on with my life and muttered into my decaffeinated tea about why this is such a difficult task.

    In the mean time, other offerings have appeared, notably, that outstanding digital calendar that Gareth Saunders produces each year and distributes at no cost on http://www.seccalendar.co.uk/ Gareth’s offering gives you all you might want in a form that can be uploaded into a digital calendar, for example, a google calendar. It thus means that you have the readings at hand wherever you have a digital calendar.

    However, I’ve always hankered after something physical – something that you could leave lying around in the oratory in the cathedral where we gather for daily prayer that would have all the readings in a format that was easy to use. Something that you could leave by the bed or in the holy corner at home which gave you the same readings for use easily and practically when at home.

    I’ve always rather regretted the fact that the church didn’t produce this as it seems to me to be the most obvious way of getting people to read the bible every day. People love lists of daily bible readings. Many people just don’t know where to start with the bible without such suggestions.

    Anyway, this year was no different to any other year in that I had a tinker with the program I started to write 19 years ago. It was not particularly easy as I had chosen to write in an unpleasant computer language called Visual Basic for Applications simply because I had the lectionary tables available in Access. (Everything is a database problem as we know from our Computer Science degrees, right?). The trouble is, I’ve never learned Visual Basic and had to keep looking up the syntax just about every line I wrote.

    I reached the usual muttering into my tea stage early this year, about a week before Advent Sunday. I retired to bed in a very grumpy mood. And I slept. And as I slept, I must have dreamed. For on waking, I immediately went and found a piece of paper and wrote out an algorithm for solving the problem – for putting all the right readings and all the right saints’ days on all the right days of the year.

    And lo – I’ve managed to produce a new Kalendar in a similar format to that which was produced all those years ago.

    Thus, this week looks like this:

    And there’s even an easy explanation of how it works like this:

    Now, having produced it for myself, as an intellectual exercise if nothing else, it being the first time I’ve really used my programming skills since graduating in 1989, what to do with it?

    It seemed to me that this might be something that people in St Mary’s would like, not least those who have just completed the Vice Provost’s challenge to read the bible in a year.

    I printed some copies off and sold them on the Sunday morning and they went like hotcakes.

    Bishop Gregor has suggested that I should make them more widely available and, having checked with the chair of the Liturgy Committee that I wasn’t stepping on any toes by doing so, am now able to do so.

    Copies are available from me in church for the sum of £3 or are available to purchase on this website here:

    http://thurible.net/product/scottish-kalendar-2017/

    There’s a hefty discount for anyone wanting to buy in bulk for a bible study group maybe or for a church stall.

    For those wondering, the spelling Kalendar is a traditional spelling for a calendar kept by the church.

    This one runs from Advent Sunday 2016 until the end of 2017.

    I’d be happy to answer any other questions about this here. At this stage, I’m not going to be publishing a pdf – this is only available in physical form.

10 responses to “The Tim Farron Question and the Archbishop of Canterbury”

  1. Bro David Avatar
    Bro David

    This brings up an interesting memory with the long-time leader of Changing Attitude England (CA). This leader was taken in by Andrew Marin, founder of the Marin Foundation (MF) when he visited the UK in conjunction with some big outdoor Christian festival you lot hold anually. Marin and his followers were attending Pride Marches/Parades around the US and getting their photos taken hunging GLBTQ folks in the marches. His foundation claims to be attempting to build a bridge between the LGBTQ community and conservative Christian communities.
    Marin was invited to comment on the CA blog. He spouted his pablum message of love for LGBTQ folks. Then, in a comment, I point blank asked Marin if he believed that we LGBTQ folks were sinners and needed to repent and become straight. He refused to answer the question. He said that I was asking the “wrong” question. Then he gave this answer verbatim from the Marin Foundation website;
    “We call these the “Big 5.” They are:
    Do you think that gays and lesbians are born that way?
    Do you think homosexuality is a sin?
    Can a LGBTQ person “change?”
    Do you think that someone can be gay and Christian?
    Are LGBTQ people going to hell?
    “The one common theme of these “Big 5” is that they are all close-ended, yes-or-no questions. Each of them must be answered with one word and they are all meant to end conversation. Based solely on one’s close-ended answers, it is easy to label, judge and dismiss the other community entirely. Thus we dehumanize a community based off of a word rather than create a productive conversation. In essence, by close-ended answers either the conservative or the LGBTQ community judges who you are, what you believe, whose team you’re on and how you should be treated.
    “Rather than answering close-ended questions, The Marin Foundation seeks to elevate the conversation and continual fruitful dialogue, as tense as that may be. This is a model taken from Jesus throughout the Gospels. Of the 25 times Jesus was asked close-ended questions, only three times did he respond with a yes or no. These three times were only after he was arrested and admitting he was the Messiah. Prior to this, Jesus never answered close-ended questions with a yes or a no. Instead, he elevated the conversation.”
    I spent the next three days searching the MF website and reading through articles and white papers. I realized that it was a ministry to the LGBTQ of wolves in sheep’s clothing. These people were trying to love vulnerable LGBTQ folks into their embrace, to slowly chip away at them until they had brought them to realize that their sexual/gender orientation was false, acting upon it was a sin and they needed to seek the help of Jesus to beome heterosexual and accept their gender assigned by birth.
    I posted my findings on the CA blog and was promply chastized and barred from further posts. In a personal email from the leader of CA I was ripped a new arsehole and declared anathema. Sadly, even LGBTQ folks in prominent positions are taken in by these folks. I think that we need to continually ask the Big 5, of everyone, epsecially those non-LGBTQ folks who profess to be our allies and supporters, secular or religious.

  2. Peter Davison Avatar

    Good column.
    So who is entitled to express opinions on ethical issues? I’ve long understood it’s the duty of all of us to have INFORMED consciences and to obey them. We may wish to consult people we believe to be more informed than we are, such as our presumed leaders, but in the end, when asked, we should at least be ready to state, however firmly or tentatively, where we stand. As for our leaders, they may or may not be better informed than we are; but we also know that ‘experts’ may be people who know more and more about less and less – and that politics often intrude into our public morality. Much of ethics is situational. That said, Jesus seems to have had much more compassion for alleged ‘sinners’ than for those who chose to label them as such. And much of our present troubles seem to stem from our desire to label and scapegoat people who appear to be different. What would happen if we simply accepted people for who they are and learned to accept that love is indeed ‘a many splendoured thing’?

  3. Graham Evans Avatar
    Graham Evans

    A very interesting new perspective and certainly a question that should be put to all the Anglican bishops who sit in the house of Lords.

  4. The Rev Sr Helena Barrett, OSB Avatar
    The Rev Sr Helena Barrett, OSB

    Absolutely spot on, Kelvin. The ABC should be asked The Question until he is sufficiently exhausted to give a clear and honest answer (whatever it may turn out to be) instead of the usual yards of ecclesiastical flannel.

    1. June B Butler Avatar
      June B Butler

      “The ABC should be asked The Question until he is sufficiently exhausted to give a clear and honest answer…”

      Justin Welby wails piteously: “I’m not the pope.”

  5. the Rev. Grant Barber Avatar
    the Rev. Grant Barber

    I always wondered how the preachers in Pepys’ diary could preach such long sermons. I think I understand better now. So glad we’ve already settled the matter in the Episcopal Church. (Oh, the answer can be a succinct “no, not sin just by its nature).

  6. Bernard Silverman Avatar
    Bernard Silverman

    if I asked an archbishop whether deliberately stamping on someone’s toe is a sin they would give a direct answer. So they should be asked the Farron question over and over again until they do similarly. If the Prime Minister can do that so can they. Indeed the question should be “the PM thinks that gay sex is not a sin. Was she right?”

  7. Kate Odling Avatar
    Kate Odling

    Very interesting. I always think that if someone does not give a clear answer to a question that they have something to hide or that their true belief/thought would be unpopular. I think the ABC has looked very uncomfortable when any direct questioning about LGBT issues are raised. So someone should ask & not accept anything but a straightforward answer. My final thought is that we are all qualified to have an opinion – what’s wrong with that?

  8. Bruce Gulland Avatar

    Whatever I think about the answer to the question, I did rather enjoy the style of your post – you had me on the edge of my seat!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Posts

  • Overseas Links – some questions

    Lots of churches have overseas links. Individual churches, dioceses, even whole provinces of the Anglican Communion often have links to places far afield. They are sometimes successful, sometimes not. But they are often built on the curious last century notions that relationship depends upon physical contact and that travel is easier than communication. Of course,…

  • Another day, another new ministry now begins

    I was at the installation of a new rector at St John’s, Shaughnessy the other night. It was an extraordinary event – the arrival of a new priest to minister in a place which has been greatly fought over. It is one of the congregations where significant numbers of people left the Anglican Communion rather…