• Easter Sermon

    I could see that they needed to get past. Their seats were on the other side of me – my right-hand side.

    I twisted my knees and they squeezed in and sat down.

    Two young men. Twentysomethings. Hipsters. All beards and tattoos.

    And everyone settled down to watch the play.

    And the hubbub settled down and the lights in the theatre began to fade.

    And just when the lights had fading, before the lights had come up on the stage, the man next to me leaned over to the other chap and said very clearly in something more than a whisper – “I love you”.

    And the play began and I got engrossed it and it was marvellous.

    And the interval came. The lights came up and people started to applaud and I heard the same voice on my right, “I love you”.

    And the interval and the second half began. And the lights faded, and “….I love you”.

    And at the end, the lights came on and I could feel him lean over again to his other half and I couldn’t hear anything because of the applause all around me. I could see his lips move but I didn’t need to lip-read – I already knew what the words would be.

    “I love you.”

    And what was happening by me was as compelling as that which was happening on the stage.

    This church has been a stage this week for some pretty compelling drama too.

    Whether it was the procession, proclamations and Passion reading last Sunday morning, the footwashing on Thursday or our encounters with the crucified on Friday, something dramatic has been unfolding here.

    I don’t know whether you can understand what it is like being a priest in Holy Week. I find myself rushing backwards and forwards from home to here and here to home whilst the whole story is being lived out for real. There’s never enough time and never enough clerical shirts. And never quite enough capacity to ever completely catch up.

    In holy week as a priest it starts to become your whole life.

    There was a point this week when I wondered whether my own identification with it had gone just too far.

    At 4 pm on Thursday I put on my tumble dryer to dry some clothes that I needed to wear that night at the Maundy Thursday service.

    At 5 pm I realised that the tumble dryer was still full of wet clothes, had broken down completely and wasn’t going to dry a thing.

    In a normal week I’d have looked around for other ways to dry the clothes and started thinking about a new tumble dryer. It being holy week, I gave a loud wail of despair and then accused it of being Judas Iscariot out to betray me.

    Sometimes the story feels very real.

    The truth is though – it is very real. And it is a great drama. And … there’s another thing that is true too – but we’ll come back to that in a minute.

    The story is real and sometimes raw in holy week because we are real and sometimes raw.

    The story moves us not because we are re-enacting something that happened a long time ago and far, far away but because it is all happening now and in fact heaven and hell are both breaking into ordinary time and disturbing everything we normally know to be true.

    It is real. And it is a great drama.

    And there’s that other thing that is true too.

    Oh yes, the voice that speaks, when the lights go down….

    Today I proclaim the resurrection to you who live in a world that needs to know that it is true.

    We have known some cruel things in recent times. A cruel massacre in Kenya. A cruel plane crash in Switzerland last week. And the cruelties of rising anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and fear of foreigners being brought into play at election time.

    One thing that Christians need to say clearly at Easter is that if Jewish people don’t feel safe in our society, as Jewish people in Scotland apparently don’t feel safe, then all people of goodwill need to commit themselves to build a world where every community feels secure.

    And the election itself takes place against a background where cruel benefit sanctions have been sold to people as a positive good and austerity measures risk dismantling the safety nets that have taken decades to build.

    So many things feel cruel. So many things feel wicked.

    But on Easter Day the truth I believe is that this world is neither cruel nor wicked at its core.

    This world is not fundamentally cruel. This world is not fundamentally bad. This world is blessed by a God who loves it.

    For Christ is risen from the grave and the most helpless situation is turned into joy. From death the most unexpected new life rises.

    We have lived the drama of holy week and through it all I’ve heard a voice saying – I love you.

    When the lights rose on the King of Glory entering Jerusalem on Palm Sunday – God was saying I love you.

    When the lights faded as he was betrayed – God was saying I love you.

    When the lights shone on the intimacy of the last supper – God was saying I love you.

    When the light of the world went out and Jesus was crucified – there was still the echo of a voice lingering in the air saying – I love you.

    And today, Christ is risen from the dead.

    Risen because death is not the end.

    Risen and carrying the news that nothing is completely hopeless.

    Risen and not merely whispering I love you in the dark but dancing it through all of creation in the light of day.

    Risen because God loves this world and risen because God says “I love you.”

    For if Christ were not risen, we would not be gathered here, in the name of the Father and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

    Amen.

7 responses to “The BA Cross Story”

  1. Tim Avatar

    Hmmm. You’re the first person I’ve seen to view it this way around.

    Different, and I agree about “witnessing to the passengers” (I don’t particularly want proselytising, least of all on a plane) but I’m not sure I agree with your conclusion.
    A cross need not be particularly outlandish; many people wear them, some of whom don’t even regard themselves as christian (heirloom, etc), and who’s going to ask their motives before declaring it still a religious symbol?

    It’s unfortunate that this has come about with someone who sees the cross as her witness, but if this stands, companies will be allowed to have discriminatory uniform policies, and it doesn’t matter who the parties are, it’s just discrimination whichever way I cut it; all the more so when it leads to *a society* in which one hides from others rather than embracing them.

  2. kelvin Avatar
    kelvin

    As I understand it, the BA uniform policy has applied to all jewelry hanging around someone’s neck. It would not be fun to get one’s Cross, Crescent, Star of David or string of pearls caught in the check-in machinery.

    It is interesting that the principle sign of Christian membership in most parts of the various churches is essentially ephemeral – baptism by its very nature is invisible in material form once performed.

    When I was in Egypt, I was quite impressed with the tattoos that many Christians had done in order to identify themselves to one another. At more than one Christian gathering I went to, the locals were vetted at the door by showing their tattoos – the presumption being that no member of any group that the Church people were frightened of would ever have a cross tattooed on their skin.

  3.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Yes, you’re quite right. A uniform is a uniform. If one absolutely wanted to wear something other than a uniform at work, then joining the Army mightn’t be the best place for me.

    Similarly, if joining the BA ranks implies wearing a uniform, and I insist on wearing some additional contraption, then , patently, possibly a position without a uniform would be better. Possibly as a clergy person?! That is if I were a compulsive proselytiser.

    Anent compulsive proselytising. There is this church building on the facade of which a sign threatens one and all with everlasting hell fire. No doubt those of that congregation consider it to be their loving duty so to do. However, to my mind, it is a most egregious assault on the urban landscape … and myself, every time I have cause to walk by.

    Yes. Yours is a most refreshing viewpoint. All the more so as it comes from within the ranks of the clergy. Possibly a reason why I’ve kept on coming back to this your blog…

    All the very best,

    Clyde Lad

  4. Alex Avatar
    Alex

    The real problem is that BA’s policy is inconsistent: turbans are allowed, hijabs are allowed and apparently Hindu bangles are allowed.

    For a uniform policy to be reasonable I think it either has to allow all, or allow none. I’m not fussed which they choose, but consistency is important.

  5. Ali Avatar
    Ali

    I think the difference between turbans, hajibs and bangles are the difference between a requirement of following a particular faith (or, rather, a conservative branch of a particular faith as with the hajob and the bangle), or a desire because of one’s faith. A cross is worn out of choice, rather than a requirement of orthodoxy.

    I talked a little about this in the sermon this morning – on a day where the church celebrates the feast of Christ the King, surely a greater sign of being a member of that Kingdom, or a follower of Christ, is the way in which we treat this planet given into our care and all who inhabit it, rather than becoming sidetracked in petty bickering about which poppy is the most Christian or the “right” to wear a cross at work regardless of uniform policy.

  6. Alex Avatar
    Alex

    “A cross is worn out of choice, rather than a requirement of orthodoxy.”

    I’m not sure that this is a difference that removes the inconsistency from BA’s uniform policy. Whether or not the turban, hijab or bangle is perceived as a ‘requirement’ of membership of a faith, it is still my choice whether or not to observe it.

    This is not to say that I think Ms Ewelda has taken the best course of action. My personal view is that she has made a mistake – instead of a greater witness, she has contributed to the perception of Christians as petty and whinging. I may have my differences with Paul(!) but I think his “Greek to the Greek, Jew to the Jew” approach has a lot to be said for it.

    But our disagreement with her position on how crucial to the Christian life is the wearing of the cross doesn’t change the fact that the policy applied treats her differently from members of other faiths.

  7. Mysterious stranger Avatar
    Mysterious stranger

    I am with you on this one.I do not like all the badges,ribbons,bands etc with uniforms.I also felt extremely uncomfortable with yesterdays interview.She has been offered the right to wear the cross on her lapel not round her neck.She can wear it inside her uniform and go with the lapel badge.

    Her fundamentalism grated.Sorry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Posts

  • Here is the sermon…

    Here’s the sermon I would have preached this morning if life had not been so cold….. In the name of God, Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier. Amen. The gospel reading that Chucks has just read is one that is very familiar to me. When I was younger, I used to go to churches which were very keen…

  • Advent Carol Service postponed

    Please note that the Advent Carol Service has been postponed until 5 December 2010 at 6.30 pm. The service this evening will be a Sung Evensong in the Synod Hall.

  • Preferring me dead

    The worst thing in listening to a debate about the Anglican Covenant is that there generally comes a point when I realise that there are speakers who would prefer me to be dead. Often those speakers would think of themselves as liberals rather than conservatives too. Perhaps it would be easier on your ears if…

  • A message from the Prime Minister

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2GBmqtOOmw&feature=player_embedded Can anybody provide a link to any mainstream church leaders saying anything similar in the UK?