• The Four Horsemen of Growth – their names and their characteristics

    Horse with a hand reaching out to it

    “And lo, after the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse of Decline had ravaged the Church of God,  there appeared on the horizon the Four Horsemen of Growth. They stalked the land offering terrifying hope, and succour to the needy”.

    There are only a limited number of ways that a church can grow. These apply both to denominations as well as to local churches.

    Last week I was at the General Synod of the Scottish Episcopal Church where we were asked to engage with the idea of becoming a growing church.

    So far as I can see there are only four major ways in which this can happen. The Four Horsemen of Growth have names. They are Immigration, Conversion, Assimilation and Procreation.

    They do not always arrive individually or sequentially. They tend to arrive in one another’s company. They are social. They are amiable. They enjoy one another’s company.

    The pathway to becoming a growing church is not one that is simple. It is not a trivial task to bring this about either in a local church or in a denomination. And I think that it is important to get to know the Four Horsemen of Growth and to become their friends.

    One of the first things that I would say about this is that I am talking about visible, measurable numerical growth. Yes, I believe that spiritual growth matters. Yes, I believe that serving the needy matters. But sometimes we do need to talk about actual numerical growth and decline in the life of the church. I sit with groups regularly who have to decide where best to spend the resources at our disposal. As I do so, I bear in mind other forms of growth but I am aware that spiritual growth and other non-numerical forms of growth will be wiped out without thinking a little bit about how churches can or can’t grow numerically.

    When thinking about this in my context, the first thing that people need to do is to put on their Hats of Holy Humility and take a long hard look at church statistics. They offer little for our comfort. This is not to say that there isn’t hope. There is hope and it is important to be able to identify where it is hiding and bring it out into the open. The reality though for my denomination is that it has been declining at a fairly steady rate since the 1920s. The patterns of decline that I live amongst were already in place long before I was born and long before I joined the church. Shifting them is not a trivial task or a quick fix. The most likely thing is that those patterns are here to stay.

    But let us grab hold of a bit of hope before thinking about the names of the Four Horsemen of Growth.

    There is something that I think need to be said clearly and unambiguously. This is that church growth is possible both in individual local congregations and also in denominations. My own congregation is bigger than it was 20 years ago when I came here. Significantly so. I can easily name other churches that have grown over a timescale of decades. Ps and Gs Church in Edinburgh and St Mungo’s, Balerno are two within my own denomination that have stories to tell about how they grew significantly. Note that those of us who do have those stories to tell also have stories to tell about how difficult things have been since the pandemic and would probably all note that it is too soon to say what the effect of that major disruption has been. But there are signs of hope in individual congregations even since that time too.

    I rejoice that there is obvious renewal and measurable growth at my neighbouring Episcopal congregation – St Bride’s, Kelvinside. (Which isn’t in Kelvinside for reasons involving a traction engine). I know of other churches in this diocese that are talking about growth as something that they are experiencing too. St Oswald’s in Maybole is another one with a story to tell.  And there are others too.

    I can see growth in congregations of different sizes and which worship in different ways.

    When we think about denominations, I am aware of confidence in at least some parts of the Free Church of Scotland. I am aware of significant interest in Orthodoxy too though that remains relatively small when looking at the bigger picture of faith patterns in this country.

    I have a fairly fundamental belief that it might be important to listen to the voices of those who can speak confidently about their congregations growing.

    I also have a fairly fundamental belief that where there is weekly worship in which people encounter God in a way that is transformative for their lives and meet clergy whom they would like to spend an hour a week with then growth is very likely to happen.

    This is one of the reasons why I always want to talk about worship and clergy whenever we have conversations about growth and mission and all that stuff. Some people really don’t want to talk about those things. But I know that I do.

    But where revival comes, how does it come?

    Well that brings us to the Four Horsemen of Growth.

    Let us deal with them one by one and name their names.

    Firstly the Horseman of Immigration.

    One of the ways in which churches can sometimes grow is through the movement of people from one place to another. This is not a growth in the number of Christians in the world but it can look encouraging locally.

    There have been historic attempts to harness the horse belonging to this horseman but not always successfully. In this diocese there was a huge effort put into building churches for immigrants to the area from Northern Ireland. (Several were not that far from me, particular the church in Anderson built to serve the docks). Scottish Episcopalians spent quite a lot of money putting up churches to welcome these workers new to the area. However, these workers new to the area seem to have preferred the  rather more reformed charms of the plain local Kirk to the exotica of Scottish Episcopalianism. Most of these churches are now long gone. It was a bold attempt to do something and we should be bold in our doings. In the long term though, the demographic changes didn’t lead to lasting change.

    However, more recently, there have been hugely positive  changes to some local churches in which the Horseman of Immigration has played his part.

    In my own congregation, Anglicans from Africa – particularly from Nigeria have arrived and enriched our experience of church hugely.

    Even more recently, there have been arrivals from Iran who have become beloved members of our local fellowship.

    Our life is greatly for the better for those who have arrived from afar.

    Here in the West End of Glasgow it often feels as though we are our own Anglican Communion with people present from India, South Africa, Japan, Canada, Mexico, the USA and West Africa.

    The Horseman of Immigration is our friend in these parts.

    Some of those arriving in my own congregation from both near and afar though have not always been Christians, never mind Anglican Christians.

    Their arrival is due to the work of the Holy Spirit stirring up their hearts at the prompting of the Horseman of Conversion.

    Conversions still happen. I see them fairly regularly. This is a surprise to many people.

    A couple of years ago I started to notice an interesting change in the pattern of people being baptised here. For what I suspect was the first time in the modern history of this congregation, the number of people being baptised as adults (or at least as children who could answer for themselves) was greater than the number of children being baptised as babies. I suspect that it is possible that we’ll soon see a year when all the baptisms here are of those who can answer for themselves.

    People still choose Christianity as a way of life. People still choose Christ. People still find themselves, sometimes to their surprise, looking to the church to find spiritual nourishment and a way of living.

    I can easily point to people who have arrived from other countries who have wanted to explore the faith of the country in which they have found themselves. (The Horsemen of Immigration and Conversion are the best of friends). I can also point to people engaging through online encounters with the church finding that they have faith where previously they had none. It used to be that I knew more people who had tried yoga, Buddhist practice and various new age expressions of faith before pitching up here. I still encounter them but now I find myself meeting people who arrive having tried to find a thoughtful way of living through exploring philosophy but now find themselves looking for something more.

    The Horseman of Conversion is surprisingly active these days and has not grown nearly as old and weary as some would suspect.

    Trotting next into view is the big, bold Horseman of Assimilation. He’s the one about whom we most rarely speak.

    This aspect of Church growth (again not the building up of Christianity but of local expressions of the church) is all about people having been brought up or having encountered other expressions of Christian faith and finding themselves drawn towards a new one.

    Here at St Mary’s the Horseman of Assimilation has blessed us with many joys over the years.

    When we do our Rough Guide to St Mary’s afternoon, something we do every three or four months, we find that most people who come to it do not have much of  a background in Episcopalianism or Anglicanism. We also find that they are astonished to discover that people such as themselves make up the majority of the congregation. And when we tell them that this is also the experience of most of the clergy that they encounter including the Provost and the Vice Provost, they fall off their chairs in amazement. (Well, they teeter on the edge of their chairs in amazement but I exaggerate a little for comedic and holy effect – comedy and holiness being a pair of friends that we may explore more in another post).

    People come to us from other churches. They tend to be looking for a relatively small number of things. They are looking for worship that makes them feel more alive and which allows them to experience joy and which will provide a comfort for their sorrows when comfort is needed. A big signifier of that is the musical life of the congregation but it isn’t the only signifier by any means. They are also looking for an open, inclusive and welcoming ethos. Here and hereabouts this tends to be signified to them by an explicit acknowledgement of LGBT equality and of women and men having equality of opportunity and practice in the congregation and in our denomination. They are also looking for a faith that is neither represented by finger-wagging nor an anything-goes free for all. In some things we are in the middle of the road and in others we are very much on one side of the road and not the other. And people know what they are looking for. If they don’t find what they are looking for here, I’m very happy to help them find it elsewhere. There will be plenty more people in this world who are looking for what happens here.

    The Horseman of Assimilation is nudging people our way all the time. But we don’t talk about it much and in my denomination we are a little afraid of making it clear that those who have first encountered God in other churches are welcome to bide with us whenever they want to walk through the door.

    The Horseman of Assimilation may find his work easier to do now that ecumenism is changing from the expectations of the 1970s to something fresh and new. In the past it was harder to keep company with this horseman because lots of people thought that denominational boundaries and distinctions were going to melt inevitably away leaving some kind of new uniting church that would hold everyone together. This hasn’t happened and the expectation that it will is on our rear horizon not the one that is in front of us.

    And so finally we come to the Horseman of Procreation.

    We can grow the church by having children and bringing them up in such a way that they find faith compelling in later life. This is not a short term strategy for growth!

    Many of our expectations about growth depend on this Horseman. Many of these expectations will not be met in our lifetime.

    I found myself looking around at the General Synod and wondering how many of those present would be able to engage meaningfully with embracing this Horseman of Growth as the major driving force behind real growth in the congregations that they come from. I have a feeling that the Horseman of Procreation has his work cut out amongst us at this time. Contraception has made his work a little harder. Modern ways of being men, women and other people have made his life a little more complicated. But he’s still at work. Children are still born. Children are still baptised. And in churches which draw them into active participation in the liturgical life of the congregation, children are part of God’s bountiful growth.

    So there we are. Four Horsemen of Growth whom we should befriend, as they befriend and help one another. If I’ve missed any other means of growth out, I’d be interested to hear about it.

    And when we talk about becoming a growing church again, though some of them may seem to be in the distance, I’d like us to be talking about which of the Horsemen of Growth we see galloping  enthusiastically towards us.

     

17 responses to “Guest Post: Beth Routledge on the Grosvenor Essay on Marriage and Human Intimacy”

  1. David Coleman Avatar
    David Coleman

    Thanks for those interesting points : as convenor of the URC’s Church & Society Committee, which returned a positive response to the govt’s drafts, I find it interesting that what is a hugely pastoral matter was referred by the Church of Scotland to their legal people, and by Piscies to Faith & Order. Possibly we need a heavyweight Latin tag similar to ‘lex orandi’ which deals with pastoral realities as the demonstrable authority which should determine all the rest. I will now read the paper you refer to, as homework for a meeting with the govt’s Simon Stockwell later this week.

    1. Beth Avatar

      I can’t comment for the Church of Scotland, obviously, but I imagine that the rationale behind using the Faith and Order Board is very much related to the fact that the SEC have focused in on the implications for the Canons to the point where they’ve become unable to see how this is a much much bigger picture than that.

      At one of the consultation meetings last year, a straight member of the clergy made a passionate case for why they see this as a pastoral issue, a view that is presumably shared by many other clergy, but it doesn’t seem to have penetrated much.

      1. kelvin Avatar

        Actually, I don’t think that the group who wrote this paper engaged in any consultation at all.

        I think Beth is thinking of a meeting that Bishop Gregor called. That was local to this diocese and not part of a provincial process.

    2. Beth Avatar

      I had been thinking of that. I had been under the impression that there were a series of meetings around the province. I am saddened and yet not that surprised to find that there weren’t.

      1. David Coleman Avatar
        David Coleman

        I have just been calming nerves at synod and local church level, due to people having assumed that the odious ‘Christian’ Institute’s ‘legal opinion’ was commissioned ecumenically, and authoritatively raised the spectre of those who say no being prosecuted, which goes utterly against the intention and the drafting efforts of the Scottish government.

  2. David Coleman Avatar
    David Coleman

    Could do with a paracetamol for the head after that, however, one or two comments.
    Matthew 5:31-32; 19:3-9 needs to be freed from the burden of traditional interpretations which are here taken as read.
    The reabsolutisation of metaphor onto the relationship which has itself supplied the metaphor could be further drawn out. I do agree with your comments on the ‘scientific’ section, comparable to a regrettable ( but at least shorter) URC document. I would also respectfully enquire why, given the EMU, persepctives from Methodists and the URC were not mentioned, rather than just the CofS?

  3. Elizabeth Avatar
    Elizabeth

    Well said, Beth. Amen. We are all affected by this debate because, as you say, it’s a matter of religious freedom and oppression and what kind of church we are a part of, but for those whose personal freedom is directely affected and who have to bear the cost, it must be deeply wearying indeed. I for one am glad that you and others are continuing to talk about this.

  4. Calum Wyllie Avatar
    Calum Wyllie

    Thank you, Beth. You say things much more eloquently that I could attempt to.

    “This is my Church, my Gospel, and my God. I believe in them and love them as deeply as I’m sure do the people who wrote this, and I choose not to sit and let the people who claim to represent me write reports about me as if I am Other.”

    A thousand times, yes.

  5. Rosemary Hannah Avatar
    Rosemary Hannah

    Well said, Beth. I fall into the category of ‘people not directly affected.’ That is to say, I fall into the category of people the authors of this report imagine fall into that category. But I think I AM directly affected. This affects my friends, my family, my children. It affects my congregation, my denomination and the reputation of my Lord in the world (very adversely) It hugely limits (as things stand) my ability to witness for Him in the world. It is utterly absurd to imagine that because I am highly unlikely ever to marry anybody of my own sex that it does not affect me directly.

    I would also have expected a Doctrine committee to have a much clearer view of the differences between innate behaviour and moral behaviour. The two are not in any way (positive or negative) linked.

  6. Kimberly Avatar

    Thanks Beth. It’s a really helpful post. I think I would also want to challenge the idea that there *are* ‘many Christians not directly affected by the debate’. We are all a part of this, whether we choose to be or not. What the church says about relationships, equality, diversity, sexuality, biblical interpretation, learning from the world around us, interpreting the tradition, proclaiming God’s love and blessing, seeing Christ in one another — all of it forms and speaks of who we are. What we say and how we say it also shapes the image of God we proclaim — for good or for ill — and it will attract or repulse people accordingly. I think you are right that danger hides behind mild, non-committal tolerance. I’m glad that you also give voice to the church and show us a better way.

  7. Jaye Richards-Hill Avatar

    Great response Beth…I noticed one of the authors was a certain Andrew Adam. Would that be the very same AKMA, one of our St Mary’s clergy team?

  8. Seph Avatar
    Seph

    Very well said.

    You may be delighted to hear that the first two Google results for “grosvenor human intimacy” are, respectively, this post and the post on your own blog linking to this post. The page on the SEC website containing the Grosvenor Report itself is only third on the list.

    1. kelvin Avatar

      Well, given that I’m in charge of the SEC website too, I probably shouldn’t get too uppity about it.

      However, this website gets more hits than the SEC website and has done for quite some time. The reality is, if people are searching for stuff about the SEC they are quite likely to find members of the SEC before they find the official pages. This is unusual for a church but not something that I think should trouble us. People trust people rather than institutions these days anyway.

  9. Lavender Buckland Avatar
    Lavender Buckland

    Others have voiced comments I gladly support: we are all affected by this; it is indeed our Gospel… how we all long for the discussion to be over.
    I’d only add that among the insidious influences is that ability to use such a paper among discussion groups, imagining tolerance but without true comprehension.

  10. Rosemary Hannah Avatar
    Rosemary Hannah

    Would there be the talent, the will, the time for – well for a different essay? With proper references, with a balanced selection of contributors, or would such a thing be either impossible, or a cause of unnecessary friction?

    1. Beth Avatar

      There would be the talent and the will and I suspect a great many of us would make the time, but (and Kelvin can correct me if I’m wrong) such an essay would not be officially endorsed by the Church, and so long as essays like this are and essays like that aren’t, therein lies the deeper issue.

      1. Rosemary Hannah Avatar
        Rosemary Hannah

        Um. On the one hand, one does not want to alienate people who might be broadly speaking sympathetic. People who may well have done their best in difficult circumstances. On the other, I am not totally convinced that most people can distinguish between official responses, and calm authoritative broadly-based responses from people within the church, and such-like. As cf the comments above by David Coleman. (And in Scotland no clergy can be forced to perform a marriage ceremony for anybody at all). However in all fairness, any attempt would need to recognise points of view which did not accept equal marriage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Posts

  • The Antisemitism Notice

    Someone asked me to share the note that we put in our service sheets in St Mary’s about antisemitism. This has evolved over the last few years but the statement below is what it looks like at the moment. We’ve also changed the pattern of readings we use at St Mary’s. In particular, we no…

  • “God swipes right” – a sermon for Lent 4, 2026

    In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen. From time to time, every couple of years or so, someone decides that it is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good cathedral, must be in want of a man. Now, I am…

  • Assisted Dying – Why I’ve changed my mind

    The time has come to admit it. I’ve changed my mind about assisted dying. As a priest, the presumption is generally made that I’m against it for religious reasons. Recent aggressive campaigning by those in favour of allowing doctors to help people to end their lives has been relentlessly dismissive of religious reasons for being…

  • Predictions 2026

    A rocky road to the enthronement of the next Archbishop of Canterbury. Further turmoil and scandal in the Anglican Episcopates of the United Kingdom. No progress for those hoping for Equal Marriage in the Church of England. More talk about the Quiet Revival which will continue not to show up in denominational statistics. Success for…