8 responses to “Synod – membership”
-
Kelvin – you are very modest in not describing your contribution to this debate – I guess it was in your usual style.
-
Kelvin, I have lurked and read here for some time. I am curious about happenings in sister Anglican churches. I live in the Diocese of Northern Mexico of the Anglican Church of Mexico. American English is a second language for me.
It is difficult for me to follow much of what is written here for two reasons. You all speak a cryptic or clipped form of English at times, even different from what I encounter from the Mad One. You also use a lot of jargon and acronyms associated with the Scottish Church.
This is all OK if you intend your blog to be mostly catering to fellow Scots. However, if you are open to a blog with more international following you all might keep my points in mind when writing.
-
I usually try to give the Spanish pronunciation of my name, as opposed to the English, but you blog does not like the augmented letters!
Perdoname.
-
Glad to see you got your connection going again – I’m impressed with your speedy blogging!
-
But what was the motion though? You can’t say it failed without telling us what it was.
-
The agenda and papers are available here:
http://www.scotland.anglican.org/index.php/news/entry/general_synod_2008_agenda_and_papers/These have all the motions and the preparatory materials.
Thanks for your comment, David – I’d be happy to try to explain any technical terms. Synod is quite confusing enough when English is your first language.
If you take a look at the papers that I pointed to above, you will see that the synod members all have a large book in front of them.
The motion which failed would have updated the way in which membership rolls are compiled to allow people to know whether or not they are on them. At the moment, membership rolls are compiled by rectors who do not need to tell people that they are included on the roll even though they may have liabilities thereby.
-
As one of my bosses used to say “all aid short of actual help”.
If you can be bothered summarising what all the speakers say why couldn’t you take another couple of minutes and summarise the motion? -
Perhaps what hasn’t been clear to readers who have come upon this post from further afield is that Kelvin was blogging the buisiness of synod in real time. That is only possible in short hand — and therefore probably of most use to those who are unable to be at synod, but broadly aware of the debates going on in the church.
So, perhaps we can let him off the hook for not being all things for all people while blogging from Synod, and be thankful for the wider pattern of good communication that we usually see here.
Previous Posts
-
Fruit for Breakfast
The diet carries on. 10 lbs lost so far. Fruit for breakfast again. Despite all my efforts, it it not possible to eat all the fruit from the trees in the back garden. On of the few nice things about clerical gardens is that they are likely to have well established fruit trees in them.…
-
Sermon – 19 September 2004
For the last couple of months I have been focusing on the underlying tone of justice in the gospel readings that we have been having week by week. This morning, I want to talk about something different, but related. I want to talk about way each of us is with God. More specifically, I want…
-
Sectarian
Is there anything more obnoxious than a local supermarket stocking Celtic and Rangers Advent Calendars?
-
Preaching to the choir
I know that this is preaching to the choir, but don’t you find it strange when people learn how to use e-mail but not the web? I’ve met three people in the last couple of weeks who told me that they used e-mail a lot, but had never learned to use the web. I cannot…
Leave a Reply