The LGBT Group at St Mary’s met on 18 February to prepare its response to the current Scottish Government consultation on the bill that it is proposing to bring in on allowing changes to marriage law in Scotland including allowing same-sex couples to be able to be marriage.
In case anyone is interested, here is the response that the group made:
St Mary’s LGBT group response to government consultation
I wanted to comment on your wiki post, but there is a gremlin preventing me – no box to write in, so no writing!
[Comment now moved]
This is what I’d have said:
Great clip! A really clear description – can we get it incorporated into an educational package for the church? See http://scotedublogs.wikispaces.com/ for a good example of a wiki in use for over a year.
Yeah. Wikis have huge potential. When I was setting up my church website I sat down and thought:
a) lots of pages
b) easy editing
c) uniform appearance across pages
d) ability to allow some people to (not) edit certain pages
End result was dokuwiki.
The real trouble is still persuading people that they’re capable of contributing…
Yes, it is odd getting people to post on a wiki is very much harder than getting them to post a comment on a blog. Something about a fear of being the authorial voice.
I think that it is fear of being contradicted and corrected, which is a shame, as whenever I post to a wiki, I’m hoping that someone can improve on what I’ve written.
Fabulous video. Thanks for linking it.
I wonder if this is one of the ways we should be trying to respond to the Draft Anglican Covenant.
Wikis are great – look forward to seeing the St Mary’s Wiki developing (and adding to it!)
Thanks for a very clear explanation! Now that I understand how they work, I’ll be raising a discussion on how we might be able to use them on the National Postgraduate Committee of the United Kingdom. They seem a very useful tool for sub-committees which do a lot of work by e-mail.
I had a look at Tim’s church website and looked at the bit with the contributions from the congregation and saw this statement:
‘Please note: the content in this section is contributed by members of the congregation and should not be considered official statements by the Church.’
I am a great fan of wikis for collaborative work, but I think this indicates one of the issues with ‘public’ wikis. These problems tend not occur when wikis are being used for internal usage or for a closed group. Open editing is very attractive but you need some form of management to ensure that defacement doesn’t occur or statements which might be damaging are published.
Also, how do I tell the difference between ‘the Church’ and ‘ members of the congregation’? Are they not the same thing?
Kennedy
[…] First posted quite a while ago here. […]
Question of the day is whether or not I am an introvert. Several people have challenged the statement that I am which appears in the 100 things about me on this site. I have a hunch that they might be right. Maybe it is time to revise that list. I’ve been doing enneagram and Myers-Briggs…
This has been an extraordinary week. The Shoe project which has just ended has surely made for one of the most interesting weeks in the 150 year life of this congregation. I have found it an extraordinary time. I have sat in the church for much of the week. And watched. And talked. I have…
The shoe exhibition is open until 8 pm tonight and tomorrow night. We will have some kind of liturgical ending to the week – the Compline of the Shoes or something like that. Then it is all hands on deck to put the church back to rights. Shoes, spinning wheel, kettle, jazz CDs all have…
Oh dear, Bridge of Allan is all acluck over a review in last week's Sunday Times which focussed on Clive Ramsey's new restaurant. People are shocked at the vitriol in the review. Questions have even been asked at the local Community Council.How can we clear the name of our village? We have been slighted.It is very…
Leave a Reply