56 responses to “Six things I have learned about anti-semitism and the church”

1. 

   Jacqui Norman

   30/04/2016

   Dear Kevin,
   I am sure that some Jews would be offended, and this is very sad on every level. Just as it would be sad for Christians to object to non Christians celebrating Christmas or Resurrection Day.
   In your piece you said yourself, that some Jewish people invite Christian people to join them for the meals. This demonstrates that the offence to Gentiles celebrating with their Jewish brothers and sisters is not universal in the faith.
   Blessings.

   Reply
   1. 

      Kelvin

      30/04/2016

      No Jacqui. It is considered a blessing in Judaism to include others in the ritual of passover. This does not justify Christians copying it without Jews being present, appropriating the ceremony to make it something entirely Christian and in doing so causing offence. It is not the same in any way as Christians objecting or not to non-Christians celebrating Christmas.

      If you wish to follow the line of saying that Christian Passovers are not offensive to all Jewish people, then can I ask what proportion of Jewish people you think it is legitimate for Christians to be offensive to? How many is OK?

      Reply
      1. 

         Jacqui Norman

         30/04/2016

         Of course one would not wish to offend anybody.
         I feel we must graciously agree to disagree, I see no difference to the Christmas/Resurrection Day comparison… We disagree on this one point from your piece.
         God bless you.

         Reply
         1. 

            Kelvin

            30/04/2016

            > We disagree on this one point from your piece.

            So what you’re saying is that anti-semitic things that other people do are wrong but things that you do can’t be anti-semitic because you do them with good intent in your heart?

            Isn’t that what the problem is?

            Reply
            1. 

               Jacqui Norman

               30/04/2016

               WOW what a leap!
               No, of course it is not what I am saying… It is the opposite!
               Your opinion is that Christians should not engage with the Old Testament. Mine is that it is divisive NOT to. As you said Jesus is Jewish, we are his body …
               I have never had a conversation with a Jew who has expressed your opinion about this matter.
               I asked you politely about this aspect of your opinion, and you have made a personal attack at me(whom you do not know) and called me an anti Semite when nothing could be further from the truth. Now, that kind of thing IS where the problem lies.
               Blessings to you.

            2. 

               Kelvin

               30/04/2016

               Don’t be ridiculous, Jacqui. My opinion is not that Christians should not engage with the Old Testament.

               If you can’t post things truthfully then I’ll not allow further comment.

      2. 

         Martin Reynolds

         30/04/2016

         I would ask the opposite question.
         How many need to be offended?
         Just one?

         This argument seems to be in the mode of
         “Christians shouldn’t practice yoga.” school of thought.

         Reply
         1. 

            Kelvin

            30/04/2016

            There’s a difference isn’t there? Most people wanting to stop Christians practicing yoga think that they should take that view because it will harm Christian souls rather because it will harm Hindu feelings.

            Reply
            1. 

               Martin Reynolds

               30/04/2016

               It depends which Hindu you talk to.

            2. 

               Kelvin

               30/04/2016

               Can you point me to an argument coming from someone in the Hindu community who believes that Christians and non-Hindus should refrain from practising yoga? I’m genuinely interested.

         2. 

            Martin Reynolds

            30/04/2016

            I will try and point you in the right direction.

            Reply
2. 

   Alexander Hamilton

   30/04/2016

   Wel now that was a jolly good read. Thank you to all contributers, some thought provoking matters raised, with of course no conclusion, and properly so. So much is a matter of personal belief and practise, no matter how bedecked and caparisoned the chuch one attends. I find myself sayng, ‘What would Jesus say?’ when watching the next best thing to pantomime at some services.

   Reply
   1. 

      Jacqui Norman

      30/04/2016

      Amen

      Reply
3. 

   Jacqui Norman

   30/04/2016

   Ps, In my opinion, the fact that “Passover is not important to most Christians ” is due to a lack of good teaching on the subject. It is not possible to fully appreciate the work of Jesus, (who in you picture, notably does not have the “Jewish nose” – very much enforcing your point that people do not appreciate that Jesus was (is!) a Jew, and with which I wholeheartedly agree with you) without first understanding the Old Testament story in its fullness.

   I would also like to emphasise that this is the only one of your points with which I disagree 🙂

   Reply
4. 

   Jacqui Norman

   30/04/2016

   From the homepage:

   Disclaimer
   The views published here are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of St Mary’s Catheral nor the Scottish Episcopal Church.

   Nor do they represent what I’ll think forever.

   I change my mind sometimes – especially when persuaded of something by someone in debate.

   Try me and see.

   Maybe that should read “Try me and get called ridiculous ”

   Very sad.

   Reply
   1. 

      Kelvin

      30/04/2016

      Jacqui – this is my blog space. You don’t get to post untruthful things about me on it.

      Whether you like that or not doesn’t really matter to me it is the way it is.

      No further comments from you.

      Reply
5. 

   Dion Smythe

   30/04/2016

   Christian “seders” are comparable to Jewish [re]appropriation of the Eurcharistic texts and reciting them [with some notable omissions] at Kiddush after the Sabbath morning service….

   Reply
   1. 

      Meg Rosenfeld

      30/04/2016

      As a Christian who once visited a conservative synagogue where they did this, I was surprised and pleased to find this activity that was so much like ours, taking place. It seemed home-like. My daughter, then a teen-ager, had the same reaction. We were both thinking “Now I see where this part of our ritual comes from.” After all, Jesus (a Jew) was probably following very familiar tradition when he, as we say, instituted the Eucharist; he just said some new and startling things.

      Reply
      1. 

         Dion Smythe

         02/05/2016

         Meg, I think you’ll find that what you witnesses at a conservative Jewish synagogue was the standard Kiddush after the Sabbath morning service — blessings over wine and bread and then the sharing of the same. What I was suggesting was that these Christian “Seders” would be comparable to Jewish congregations celebrating Christian Eucharists but with the important words left out [or indeed maybe even not] rather than the comparison between Christian “Seders” and Jews [or other non Christians] celebrating or marking the celebrations of Christmas or Easter, but not going so far as to have a parody of the Christian Eucharist.

         Reply
         1. 

            Meg Rosenfeld

            02/05/2016

            Hmm. since I’ve never seen the sort of thing you’re describing, I can’t really make an intelligent comment. It’s difficult to think of a literal parody of a Christian ritual (except maybe in the case of a group of kids “playing church”) other than the secular Santa-centered goings-on which seem to be increasingly taking over the holy day commonly known as Christmas . . .

            Reply
6. 

   Meg Rosenfeld

   30/04/2016

   Back to St. John, sometimes I can’t help wondering what Jesus would say if he heard some of John’s more convoluted pronouncements. What’s the Aramaic for “Huh?”

   Reply
7. 

   James Byron

   30/04/2016

   Regarding offensiveness: surely Christianity’s central claim, that Jesus of Nazareth was God in human form, is deeply offensive to Judaism.

   Further, offense isn’t a knockdown argument. It just means that someone strongly objects to something. Many evangelicals find gay relationships offensive; many Calvinists find Arminianism offensive, and so on. Such feelings say nothing for the merits of the view.

   The key question isn’t whether X is offensive, but whether the objections are reasonable and compelling enough to justify ending it.

   Reply
   1. 

      Dennis

      02/05/2016

      Once again, we have a problem with most of western society having forgotten the difference between disagreeing with and being offended by. Offensiveness is most certainly not just when someone strongly objects to something. Calvinists don’t or shouldn’t find Armenianism offensive, though they disagree with it. It is merely a competing theory that divides evangelicals. But a play or novel that presented John Calvin as pimp who ran a brothel on the side and committed sex crimes with little boys would be offensive because it would be a false characterization meant to belittle and demean. So-called Christian seders are more like the sex-crime pimp John Calvin example than the disgreement with non-predestinationist types example – and would therefore be offensive.

      Reply
8. 

   Bernard Randall

   03/05/2016

   At the risk of re-opening a can of worms, it seems to me a mistake to suggest that passover is not important to Christians. The death of the firstborn Son, the crossing of the people through the waters etc – the whole Exodus narrative – are deeply part of Christian theology. It’s an inescapable background to much in the New Testament (Sermon on the Mount as reflecting Moses on Sinai, or Jesus (in John’s Gospel) being crucified at the same time as the Passover lambs are sacrificed, anyone?).
   So to take just a few liturgical examples, in “Common Worship” material for Easter season, the introduction to confessional starts “Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed for us …”; the Eucharistic prefaces say “he is the true paschal lamb” or “in the joy of this Passover”; and the invitation to Communion is “Alleluia. Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us. Therefore let us keep the feast. Alleluia.”
   Fine, that’s Church of England, not everyone will be saying those particular words, but the theology is front and centre.
   To this extent the passover story belongs just as much to Christianity as to Rabbinic Judaism. But the passover story in the Bible is not the same as the Passover religious observance/festival of modern Judaism.
   Indeed I thoroughly object to Christians celebrating a Seder meal, because it isn’t what Jesus did – both because the Seder as we have it is a later development, and because the Last Supper quite likely wasn’t a Passover meal. A “Christian Seder” doesn’t connect us to anything historically, while we have the Eucharist (and Maundy foot washing) to connect theologically to what Jesus did at the Last Supper.
   I don’t think that being offensive alone is a reason not do something with another more positive purpose, but in the case of a “Christian Seder” the offense is caused to no good purpose and so the case against is fatal. It ought not to be done.

   Reply