What is in Kelvin's Head?

  • Scotland Says No!

    The Scottish Episcopal Church has resoundingly rejected the Anglican Covenant as a way forward for the Anglican Communion. At the same time, the Synod passed a motion rejoicing in our commitment to the Communion itself. What we have said is No to the Covenant, but Yes to the Communion.

    The vote was decisive – 6 in favour of the motion adopting the Covenant, 112 against and 13 abstaining.

    Interestingly, I didn’t speak in the debate. I didn’t need to.

    Once upon a time, I would have been on my feet encouraging, threatening, cajoling. I’d have been sowing fear, uncertainty and doubt. I would have been at work behind the scenes, bending people’s ears, twisting people’s arms – all to get them to reject the Covenant.

    In the end, I didn’t need to. It just turned out to be something that the church overwhelmingly felt was not the way forward.

    We should not underestimate the significance of the decision though. It will resound around the communion. In the Church of England, there was not enough support in the dioceses to bring the thing to Synod. In Scotland, we took a different strategy – ensuring that it did come to Synod. We took a clear vote and said a clear no. We are the first province to reject the Covenant in a synodical vote, I think.

    No to the Covenant. Yes to the Communion.

    You heard that on this blog first.

    It is now the policy of this Province.

    Thanks be to God.

    , ,

One response to “Eid, Pride and Abraham’s Sacrifice”

  1. Tim Avatar
    Tim

    As one who grew up(?) in churches leaning toward the view “it’s a tough story for a tough world, how else would God be just?” in varying degrees, I agree the face-value-narrative understanding of the story is repellant.

    One thing stood out for the first time during Sunday’s reading: the plurality in Abraham’s line – “…and we will return to you”. I’ve been idly wondering about that since.
    It doesn’t make the story wholly acceptable as Abraham still ploughs on ever closer.
    But if one’s goal is to find a “by faith, Abraham” in there, better to say it’s the prior confidence that things will somehow work out well (which I thought was how Hebrews was trying to define it), than to locate the commendable quality in violence (which, by rabbiting on about resurrection, Hebrews does).

    In the absence of other clear & wholly mitigating contexts in which to place the story, certainly it’s simplest, easiest and probably best to file it under “that’s how they saw God back then” and move swiftly on.

    Oofft.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Posts

  • The Tory Party at Prayer

    Whilst flicking channels on the television yesterday I happened upon the beginning of the Tory party conference in Blackpool. They began with something which I found rather disturbing – a religious (nay, Christian) service led by a vested Anglican priest. Now, I know that there are Anglican priests who are Tories, as we even have…

  • America

    When I get too depressed about America – which happens more these days than it ever used to do – I just have a moment of thankfulness for the internet. It has its roots in a US military network that was designed to function even if nuclear war had been inflicted o­n us. What started…

  • Harvest Supper last night

    It was good to hear someone say last night at the harvest supper saying how much they are enjoying being part of a church which is growing. It is – church is much more fun when new people are being incorporated into the congregation all the time. I also heard someone say that the Sunday morning…

  • Cat vs Presiding Officer

    This morning, the cat decided to take o­n the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament. It was a surprisingly well balanced fight – she usually manages to scare people, but he was having none of it at all. Indeed, she was batted off just like a junior, naughty MSP might be batted off. She is…