What was I reading on holiday?

21/05/2012
Well, I’m just back from two week’s holiday and back to the soulface today.

Have you missed me?

I’ve spent two lovely weeks in the sun, sitting on a terrace in the South of France watching the view and reading.

You want to know what I’ve been reading on holiday? Oh, thank you for asking.

Actually, I’ve read more on this holiday than I have in months – something that I put down to the fact that I had a new tablet with me which allowed me to read electronic books. Didn’t know how I’d cope with that, but turns out to be great.

Here’s the pages I kept turning….
- The Mayor of Casterbridge: The Life and Death of a Man of Character (Penguin Classics) – Thomas Hardy. (One of my O Level books. Not read for years.
- Portnoy’s Complaint – Philip Roth (Relentless, funny, sad)
- Breakfast at Tiffany’s– Truman Capote (Surprised by the advocacy of same-sex marriage in the 1940s).
- Oryx And Crake – Margaret Atwood (Strange – oh so very strange)
- Things Fall Apart – Chinua Achebe (Great novel about Ibo culture meeting the Western missionaries)
- Leaving Alexandria: A Memoir of Faith and Doubt – Richard Holloway. (Was reading this for review in inspires)
All that and a few scraps of poetry. Enjoyed it all.

One response to “Eid, Pride and Abraham’s Sacrifice”

Tim

06/07/2023

As one who grew up(?) in churches leaning toward the view “it’s a tough story for a tough world, how else would God be just?” in varying degrees, I agree the face-value-narrative understanding of the story is repellant.

One thing stood out for the first time during Sunday’s reading: the plurality in Abraham’s line – “…and we will return to you”. I’ve been idly wondering about that since.
It doesn’t make the story wholly acceptable as Abraham still ploughs on ever closer.
But if one’s goal is to find a “by faith, Abraham” in there, better to say it’s the prior confidence that things will somehow work out well (which I thought was how Hebrews was trying to define it), than to locate the commendable quality in violence (which, by rabbiting on about resurrection, Hebrews does).

In the absence of other clear & wholly mitigating contexts in which to place the story, certainly it’s simplest, easiest and probably best to file it under “that’s how they saw God back then” and move swiftly on.

Oofft.

Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Previous Posts

Monday Evening

11/08/2003

Went to Edinburgh today. Saw the new Paolozzi windows in St Mary's Cathdral. Perhaps they will grow on me with time, but today I found them quite hard to enjoy. Much more moving was the YWCA installation beneath the windows. 104 pairs of women's shoes with messages from the owners from every part of Scottish life, supporting an…
Answers to questions

11/08/2003

Someone has e-mailed me to ask what this blog is all about and who it is aimed at. I suppose it is about me! As for whom it is aimed at, I am not sure. Whoever wants to read it, I suppose. Already, I know that some members of the congregation have had a look…
Sunday Morning 0730

10/08/2003

The computer that I use for generating music for Sunday services sometimes, is breaking down. We cannot complain as it cost just ?10 last year. I am going to appeal to the congregation for an old computer to replace it. I could have a broken computer mountain on my hands before the end of the…
Sermon on 10 August 2003

09/08/2003

There has been a row in my family this week. I was wondering whether you would all like to hear about it this morning…