What is in Kelvin's Head?

  • Pride Meeting Point – A Correction

    6630575919_77b0a72d1b_z
    This coming Saturday there will be a Pride march in Glasgow. There will be a gathering of Scottish Episcopalians (and friends) marching together in glad array.

    Last week I announced that we would meet at the southern end of the Wiggly Bridge (which is the Tradeston Pedestrian Bridge), which is not the Squinty Bridge (which is in fact the Clyde Arc).

    However, it has since been pointed out to me that there is no Wiggly Bridge (which is the Tradeston Pedestrian Bridge) in Glasgow. The bridge that we will meet by is the Squiggly Bridge and it is in fact called the Tradeston Bridge, not the Tradeston Pedestrian Bridge.

    We will continue not to meet anywhere near the Squinty Bridge.

    Is that clear?

    The muster time is 0915.

    [Photo from David Brossard – (c) Creative Commons – Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic]

    ,

9 responses to “Scotland Says No!”

  1. Tim Avatar
    Tim

    Hallelujah!!

    Reply
  2. Eamonn Avatar
    Eamonn

    Amen!

    Reply
  3. Susan Sheppard Hedges Avatar
    Susan Sheppard Hedges

    Yes!!!

    Reply
  4. Martin Reynolds Avatar
    Martin Reynolds

    “something that the church overwhelmingly felt was not the way forward”

    …… the way set by the emergency Primates meeting way back when Gene had just been elected was not the way forward and, sad to say, I can’t think of any good that has flowed from it.

    I can only hope that the threats are now over and the listening begins.

    Reply
  5. Neil Oliver Avatar
    Neil Oliver

    Excellent news.

    Reply
  6. Zebadee Avatar
    Zebadee

    This has to be good news for the Anglican Communion it’self.

    Reply
  7. Brother David Avatar
    Brother David

    TBTG!

    Reply
  8. Brother David Avatar
    Brother David

    BTW, Father Mark Harris in the US says that the Philippine province has already said no to the covenant.

    Reply
  9. Kelvin Holdsworth Avatar
    Kelvin Holdsworth

    Yes – it is reported that the Philippine province has said no, but the reports I saw suggested that it was their bishops who said no rather than a vote in a General Synod.

    My point was that I think that the Scottish Synod is the first actual Synod of a Province to say no. Happy to be proved wrong though.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Posts

  • Relation of College of Bishops to the General Synod

    Someone asked me recently what the relationship was between the College of Bishops and the General Synod. It is a good question. Fortunately, the code of canons is quite specific about this. Canon 52 Section 20 is helpfully clear: The Primus may at any time, when requested to do so by the College of Bishops,…

  • Mothering Sunday

    Here is a treat for Mothering Sunday – here at St Mary’s we are having the annual “Come to Mother Church” shindig at 6.30 pm. We’ve got massed musicians from all over the diocese singing some great music, a pinch of poetry, a wee sermon from me and the delight of singing songs of praise…

  • Petition and Parliamentary Update

    You’ll remember that I was going on about people signing a petition to allow gay couples the same access to marriage as straight couples. Here is the update on what happened when the petition was presented. On Tuesday afternoon, the petition was heard by the Scottish Parliamentary Public Petitions Committee. There was cross party (Green,…